News:

:) You cannot see "members only" boards if you are not a member, so please join the forum!

Main Menu

Wish List for PFE Features

Started by jeb, October 07, 2013, 11:35:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

John Donovan

#240
We can confirm this numerically but running the quantification. Here is the TDI without aggregation:



Note the DEV% number. Now, here with intensity aggregation:



Notice that the TDI DEV% went from 0.6% to 0.2%, a decrease of a factor of three. TDII: is the intensity intercept and TDIL: is the log intensity intercept.
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

BenjaminWade

Hi John
Super cool. Many thanks for developing and implementing that over such a short span, I think it will be very useful. I have sort of highjacked the Wishlist thread into a development thread, so feel free if you want to take these Alternating On/off posts from the Wishlist thread and make a separate thread out of them...
Time to play with the new feature~

Cheers

John Donovan

Quote from: BenjaminWade on October 11, 2016, 08:59:21 PM
Super cool. Many thanks for developing and implementing that over such a short span, I think it will be very useful. I have sort of highjacked the Wishlist thread into a development thread, so feel free if you want to take these Alternating On/off posts from the Wishlist thread and make a separate thread out of them...
Time to play with the new feature~

No worries, this is exactly what this topic is for.

But you're right, we should have a separate topic for alternating on/off intensity discussion. Feel free to create one. On the other hand, there's a nice discussion here

http://smf.probesoftware.com/index.php?topic=29.msg387#msg387

on Ti in Quartz, which would also be appropriate.
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

SXFiveFEJohn

I would be interesting to have the user be able to define what is possible in terms of a _low_ Faraday cup current. Currently, it seems that if PfE reads any FA measurement below 1.000 nA, it assumes the filament is blown (or some other non-starter). We would like to do some experiments with PfE using EDS with our SDD detector on beam sensitive materials using _low_ current, below 1 nA. Would you consider permitting a user, say in the probewin.ini file, to set, the lower limit on when PfE issues "your filament is shot" type of comment?

John Donovan

Quote from: SXFiveFEJohn on October 27, 2016, 02:40:09 PM
I would be interesting to have the user be able to define what is possible in terms of a _low_ Faraday cup current. Currently, it seems that if PfE reads any FA measurement below 1.000 nA, it assumes the filament is blown (or some other non-starter). We would like to do some experiments with PfE using EDS with our SDD detector on beam sensitive materials using _low_ current, below 1 nA. Would you consider permitting a user, say in the probewin.ini file, to set, the lower limit on when PfE issues "your filament is shot" type of comment?

Hi John,
It's already there in the Probewin.ini file under the [faraday] section:

[faraday]
MinimumFaradayCurrent=0.1

The default is 0.1 nA so maybe you changed it at some point?
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

Anette von der Handt

Hi,

just curious. Would it be possible to have Picture Snap as a standalone utility? It gets a lot of use in my lab even when we don't use PFE (like for example with the EDS software). I always have to show the users how to open PFE, create a file etc just to get to PictureSnap. This is obviously not a very big problem but I thought I might ask.
Against the dark, a tall white fountain played.

John Donovan

Quote from: Anette von der Handt on November 11, 2016, 03:03:14 PM
Just curious. Would it be possible to have Picture Snap as a standalone utility? It gets a lot of use in my lab even when we don't use PFE (like for example with the EDS software). I always have to show the users how to open PFE, create a file etc just to get to PictureSnap. This is obviously not a very big problem but I thought I might ask.

Hi Anette,
Your best bet would be to simply run the Stage utility, as it has PictureSnap also.
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

Anette von der Handt

Against the dark, a tall white fountain played.

Anette von der Handt

Ok, I will hide my question here as I think I am just missing it (I think I may have even asked this before). Are there probewin.ini keywords to turn on/off:

Automate window: Use confirm during acquisition
Peaking options window: Acquire automated pha scan after peaking
Peak/Scan options: Use ROM based spectrometer scanning
Acquisition options: Quick Standard Acquisition modes (Assigned/Assigned or Major Elements)

Thanks!
Against the dark, a tall white fountain played.

Probeman

#249
Quote from: Anette von der Handt on November 15, 2016, 03:50:39 PM
Are there probewin.ini keywords to turn on/off:

Automate window: Use confirm during acquisition

Yes.

[Software]
UseConfirmDuringAcquisitionFlag = 0     ; 0 = off, 1 = on

Quote from: Anette von der Handt on November 15, 2016, 03:50:39 PM
Peaking options window: Acquire automated pha scan after peaking

No. But the flag is saved to your MDB file for each run.

Quote from: Anette von der Handt on November 15, 2016, 03:50:39 PM
Peak/Scan options: Use ROM based spectrometer scanning

Yes.

[General]
PeakCenterMethod=2     ; 0 = interval halving, 1 = parabolic, 2 = ROM, 3 = manual

Quote from: Anette von der Handt on November 15, 2016, 03:50:39 PM
Acquisition options: Quick Standard Acquisition modes (Assigned/Assigned or Major Elements)

No.

Could be added though...
The only stupid question is the one not asked!

glennpoirier

Hi,
Would it be possible for PfE to check to see if the reflected light is on (and turn it on if necessary) before doing an autofocus and the turn it off again after the autofocus?
or is this already implemented somewhere?
This would be useful when automatically acquiring backscatter images after each analysis.
Thanks!

John Donovan

Quote from: glennpoirier on December 01, 2016, 10:58:09 AM
Hi,
Would it be possible for PfE to check to see if the reflected light is on (and turn it on if necessary) before doing an autofocus and the turn it off again after the autofocus?
or is this already implemented somewhere?
This would be useful when automatically acquiring backscatter images after each analysis.
Thanks!

Easy peasy!

I am doing it for all the other instruments, but forgot to do this for the 8x30 instruments!
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

glennpoirier


John Donovan

Quote from: glennpoirier on December 01, 2016, 12:14:33 PM
Thanks John! Awesome service  :D

You are most welcome.

Please try the test Probewin.exe in the PFE Dropbox.
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

Mike Matthews

Hi John,

Just trying the new version with the auto light on and off with autofocus. Nice feature, but can you i) add a delay, of at least a second if not 2, to the the autofocus start allow the light to come on (its a bit too quick off the mark at the moment and tries to focus in the dark so sometimes misses finding focus), and ii) add the option to either toggle the light or not - it's great when running samples, but a bit of a niusance when trying to confirm standard positions and just as you're about to adjust the position the light goes out :o.

Mike